METHOD AND ETHICS

Evidence quality is a process, not decoration.

We show where a conclusion came from, how reliable it is and where knowledge ends. Automation assists discovery; an analyst remains accountable for interpretation.

Analyst robot comparing several sources in a quiet archive

VERIFICATION STANDARD

Six steps from brief to conclusion.

01

Frame the question

Define the client decision, subject, jurisdictions and completion criteria.

02

Build the source plan

Select relevant registries, archives, media, corporate records and digital sources.

03

Minimise data

Collect only what is necessary for the agreed lawful purpose.

04

Test provenance

Compare dates, authorship, primacy, context and contradictions.

05

Corroborate

Confirm material claims across independent sources where possible.

06

State confidence

Separate facts, analysis, hypotheses and information gaps.

BOUNDARIES

Research without crossing the line.

Public availability does not grant unlimited rights to collect, retain or disclose. Lawful purpose, proportionality and data minimisation are assessed first.

KONTUR / REFUSAL POLICY

What we do not do

  • Hacking accounts, email or devices
  • Buying stolen or leaked databases
  • Bypassing authentication or access controls
  • Location tracking for harassment or stalking
  • Blackmail, retaliation or discriminatory screening
  • Publishing personal data without a lawful basis
  • Promising a predetermined or unsupported conclusion
We cannot guarantee that a requested fact exists in open sources. We do guarantee a documented process and honest separation of evidence from assumption.